<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: STAR TREK (part 2) BOLDLY goes back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemagogue.com/2010/01/26/star-trek-part-two-boldly-goes-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2010/01/26/star-trek-part-two-boldly-goes-back/</link>
	<description>redefining entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:16:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: STAR TREK (part 1) Has Gone Before - cinemagogue</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2010/01/26/star-trek-part-two-boldly-goes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>STAR TREK (part 1) Has Gone Before - cinemagogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinemagogue.com/?p=1733#comment-871</guid>
		<description>[...] the next installment, we&#8217;ll look at the eternal truths of Trek, revealing how and why the classic Trek WAS updated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next installment, we&#8217;ll look at the eternal truths of Trek, revealing how and why the classic Trek WAS updated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Roper</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2010/01/26/star-trek-part-two-boldly-goes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinemagogue.com/?p=1733#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Yes indeedy, Star Trek was the nuts. I cannot believe I still haven&#039;t got around to seeing it on DVD. Still living off the memories of seeing it in the cinema. Loved it that they took the time to off the anonymous guy in the red shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeedy, Star Trek was the nuts. I cannot believe I still haven&#8217;t got around to seeing it on DVD. Still living off the memories of seeing it in the cinema. Loved it that they took the time to off the anonymous guy in the red shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
