<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bourne Again&#8230; and Again&#8230; and Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemagogue.com/2008/01/04/bourne-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2008/01/04/bourne-again/</link>
	<description>redefining entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:27:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cinemagogue &#124; Bourne Three Takes Three, Targeting Audio Awards</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2008/01/04/bourne-again/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinemagogue &#124; Bourne Three Takes Three, Targeting Audio Awards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2008/01/04/bourne-again/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>[...] posted a written review on the Bourne movies a while back, but since the film won two awards for aspects of audio, I thought it prudent to post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted a written review on the Bourne movies a while back, but since the film won two awards for aspects of audio, I thought it prudent to post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinemagogue &#124; From Harryhausen to the Handycam: The Beast from 20,000 YouTube Views</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2008/01/04/bourne-again/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinemagogue &#124; From Harryhausen to the Handycam: The Beast from 20,000 YouTube Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2008/01/04/bourne-again/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>[...] this allows the film to set an odd pacing and jump-cut style that makes even Paul Greengrass&#8217; Bourne movies seem steady. Some will complain about this style; my advice? Don&#8217;t sit too close to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this allows the film to set an odd pacing and jump-cut style that makes even Paul Greengrass&#8217; Bourne movies seem steady. Some will complain about this style; my advice? Don&#8217;t sit too close to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review of the Bourne Trilogy &#171; a hundred visions and revisions</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2008/01/04/bourne-again/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Review of the Bourne Trilogy &#171; a hundred visions and revisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2008/01/04/bourne-again/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>[...] Review of the Bourne&#160;Trilogy  Pastor James Harleman of Mars Hill&#8217;s Cinemagogue site has posted an intriguing review of The Bourne Ultimatum, with reflections on the Bourne Trilogy here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review of the Bourne&nbsp;Trilogy  Pastor James Harleman of Mars Hill&#8217;s Cinemagogue site has posted an intriguing review of The Bourne Ultimatum, with reflections on the Bourne Trilogy here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2008/01/04/bourne-again/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2008/01/04/bourne-again/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the first and third film and found the second to be not as compelling with a weaker story arc...and #2 was also over-edited. Some of the themes of redemption were obvious to me, but this analysis opens my eyes to new ways in which the symbolism is present...whether the filmmakers intended it or not. Good stuff, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the first and third film and found the second to be not as compelling with a weaker story arc&#8230;and #2 was also over-edited. Some of the themes of redemption were obvious to me, but this analysis opens my eyes to new ways in which the symbolism is present&#8230;whether the filmmakers intended it or not. Good stuff, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
