<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Hollywood have a Sequel-ly Transmitted Disease?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/</link>
	<description>redefining entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:47:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I agree with Daniel - as creative as Hollywood is capable of being, and on occasion is, the driving force is ultimately the money. If a character or film makes money, it seems like you can bet on a sequel (or remake if it&#039;s old enough), even if by all other accounts it doesn&#039;t merit one (Shrek). If it doesn&#039;t, even with bankable elements like a star, author or director involved, it&#039;s left alone no matter its creative appeal (Rushmore).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Daniel &#8211; as creative as Hollywood is capable of being, and on occasion is, the driving force is ultimately the money. If a character or film makes money, it seems like you can bet on a sequel (or remake if it&#8217;s old enough), even if by all other accounts it doesn&#8217;t merit one (Shrek). If it doesn&#8217;t, even with bankable elements like a star, author or director involved, it&#8217;s left alone no matter its creative appeal (Rushmore).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy M.</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>You mention &quot;full narrative immersion&quot;--I think this is important when comparing videogame writing to movie writing. The best videogame writing happens when the story is seamless with the gaming experience. (Good examples: Assassin&#039;s Creed, Shadow of the Colossus. Bad Examples: Halo 3, any movie-franchise game.) Even though you don&#039;t physically interact with a movie, I think some of the best movies are able to achieve similar &quot;immersion&quot; both on their own and within a franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention &#8220;full narrative immersion&#8221;&#8211;I think this is important when comparing videogame writing to movie writing. The best videogame writing happens when the story is seamless with the gaming experience. (Good examples: Assassin&#8217;s Creed, Shadow of the Colossus. Bad Examples: Halo 3, any movie-franchise game.) Even though you don&#8217;t physically interact with a movie, I think some of the best movies are able to achieve similar &#8220;immersion&#8221; both on their own and within a franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrenchey</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>wrenchey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I like the references to the beginning of filmmaking as perspective for where we are now...maybe sequels will take a backseat in our cyclical world...but what do we do with these films that come from the little screen and really should stay there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the references to the beginning of filmmaking as perspective for where we are now&#8230;maybe sequels will take a backseat in our cyclical world&#8230;but what do we do with these films that come from the little screen and really should stay there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>I hated Coffee and Cigarettes as well.

I think that it all comes down to dollars.  Sequels make more money.  If a movie succeeds, people will pay to see more of a successfull film.

If people started to buy tickets to non-sequel movies, Hollywood would adapt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hated Coffee and Cigarettes as well.</p>
<p>I think that it all comes down to dollars.  Sequels make more money.  If a movie succeeds, people will pay to see more of a successfull film.</p>
<p>If people started to buy tickets to non-sequel movies, Hollywood would adapt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amity</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Amity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Both you and Elliot are absolutey correct in your critiques of the sequely trends of Hollywood.  And the Scripture at the end certainly completes the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both you and Elliot are absolutey correct in your critiques of the sequely trends of Hollywood.  And the Scripture at the end certainly completes the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregorio D. Rothbard</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregorio D. Rothbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/27/does-hollywood-have-a-sequel-ly-transmitted-disease/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>The hero archetype is a way to fulfill our great commission.  We need to retell the story of Christ again and again.  We need to tell our story, sing our new song, and show what is really a hero.  We need to see that people desire to hear Jesus heroic journey again and again, serialize, so that we can give our message in a way that moves people to action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hero archetype is a way to fulfill our great commission.  We need to retell the story of Christ again and again.  We need to tell our story, sing our new song, and show what is really a hero.  We need to see that people desire to hear Jesus heroic journey again and again, serialize, so that we can give our message in a way that moves people to action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

