<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloated Budgets Plus Shrinking Creativity Equals&#8230; Success?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/</link>
	<description>redefining entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:20:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinemagogue &#124; Does Hollywood have a Sequel-ly Transmitted Disease?</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinemagogue &#124; Does Hollywood have a Sequel-ly Transmitted Disease?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] Content          Previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Content          Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastor James Harleman</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastor James Harleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>This is true in other mediums too, Daniel - I can&#039;t disagree. Budget cuts made us get creative with our church building&#039;s interior design; we had to get creative with less and I think overall it turned out better.

I seem to remember Chris Carter mentioning that they were lauded for their &quot;showing less and implying more&quot; approach to X-Files as being very innovative and even spookier... but that it was truly born of budget concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true in other mediums too, Daniel &#8211; I can&#8217;t disagree. Budget cuts made us get creative with our church building&#8217;s interior design; we had to get creative with less and I think overall it turned out better.</p>
<p>I seem to remember Chris Carter mentioning that they were lauded for their &#8220;showing less and implying more&#8221; approach to X-Files as being very innovative and even spookier&#8230; but that it was truly born of budget concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hansen</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Interesting that you bring this up.  Being in film school, us students frequently talk about this issue.  The consensus here is that having a big budget for a movie can stifle creativity.  Though not always the case,  an engaging story will always beat out a technical masterpiece.  It&#039;s when you utilize both when things get interesting, (Star Wars, Jaws, E.T., Lord of the Rings.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you bring this up.  Being in film school, us students frequently talk about this issue.  The consensus here is that having a big budget for a movie can stifle creativity.  Though not always the case,  an engaging story will always beat out a technical masterpiece.  It&#8217;s when you utilize both when things get interesting, (Star Wars, Jaws, E.T., Lord of the Rings.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly Ossinger</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly Ossinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/12/bloated-budgets-plus-shrinking-creativity-equals-success/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I have been introduced to wonderful indie films, documentaries, narratives, shorts, through small film festival venues such as the Port Townsend Film Festival.  Haven&#039;t yet viewed a movie there that I didn&#039;t like for some reason (great choices) and more importantly, they all have something that really makes me critically think about the content.  Some rather disturbing (&quot;Facing Sudan&quot;).  Most of the time I pass on Hollywood, preferring to save up my viewing time and $ for these venues.  Stark difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been introduced to wonderful indie films, documentaries, narratives, shorts, through small film festival venues such as the Port Townsend Film Festival.  Haven&#8217;t yet viewed a movie there that I didn&#8217;t like for some reason (great choices) and more importantly, they all have something that really makes me critically think about the content.  Some rather disturbing (&#8220;Facing Sudan&#8221;).  Most of the time I pass on Hollywood, preferring to save up my viewing time and $ for these venues.  Stark difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

