<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third Time&#8217;s a DISMEMBERING Charm&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/03/third-times-a-dismembering-charm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/03/third-times-a-dismembering-charm/</link>
	<description>redefining entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:16:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth MacGillivray</title>
		<link>http://cinemagogue.com/2007/10/03/third-times-a-dismembering-charm/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth MacGillivray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxpopnetwork.com/cinemagogue/2007/10/03/third-times-a-dismembering-charm/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>&quot;My main complaint with the film is that Milla Jovovichâ€™s face is digitally softened and smoothed in several scenes to the point of notable absurdity.&quot;

No kidding! There were times in the film where I kept asking myself if they had done that on purpose to try to give the impression that she was sorta superhuman and not subject to the ravages of time and environment, but when, in other shots, she looked normal, I realized it was just bad filmaking. Really, really weird decision, particularly since she&#039;s so beautiful without the digital enhancement.

Otherwise, I really liked it. Most entertaining one of the bunch, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My main complaint with the film is that Milla Jovovichâ€™s face is digitally softened and smoothed in several scenes to the point of notable absurdity.&#8221;</p>
<p>No kidding! There were times in the film where I kept asking myself if they had done that on purpose to try to give the impression that she was sorta superhuman and not subject to the ravages of time and environment, but when, in other shots, she looked normal, I realized it was just bad filmaking. Really, really weird decision, particularly since she&#8217;s so beautiful without the digital enhancement.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I really liked it. Most entertaining one of the bunch, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
